The COMMON LAW’S CONSTITUTIONAL TRADITION.
Introductory Remarks and Historiographic Contributions to the Understanding of the Stare Decisis’ Doctrine.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25247/2764-8907.2023.v2n1.p1-35Keywords:
constitutional law, legal history, british law, american lawAbstract
The paper presents the English Constitutional background. In England there is no written Constitution, with rigid formulas for amendment, as elsewhere in Europe. The paper presents a historical outline of this tradition, including remarks about the direct legacy of England's constitutional history, that is, the North-American constitutional tradition.
Downloads
References
AGOSTINI, Eric. Droit Compare. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Frande, 1998.
ALDERMAN, Ellen e KENNEDY, Caroline. In Our Defense- the Bill of Rights in Action. New York: Avon Books, 1990.
ANCEL, Marc. Utilidade e Métodos do Direito Comparado. Porto Alegre: Sérgio Antonio Fabris, 1980.
BAILYN, Bernard. The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1992.
BARRON, Jerome A. e DIENES, C. Thomas. Constitucional Law. Saint Paul: West Group, 2003.
BEARD, Charles A. An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. New York: The Free Press, 1986.
BERMAN, Harold J. Law and Revolution- The formation of the western legal tradition. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.
BICKEL, Alexander M. The least dangerous branch: the Supreme Court at the bar of politics. 2ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.
BORK, Robert H. The Tempting of America, The Political Seduction of the Law. New York: Touchstone Book, 1990.
CANTOR, Norman F. Imagining the law: common law and the foudations of the American Legal System. 1.ed. New York: Harper Perennial, 1997.
CHEMERINSKY, Erwin. Constitutional Law- Principles and Policies. New York: Aspen Law, 2002.
CONSTANTINESCO, Leontin-Jean. Tratado de Direito Comparado- Introdução ao Direito Comparado. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 1998.
COOPER, Phillip J. Battles on the bench: conflict inside the Supreme Court. Lawrence, KA: University Press of Kansas, 1995.
DAVID, René e BRIERLEY, John E.C. Major Legal Systems in the World Today. New York: Macmillan, 1978.
DAVID, René. Le Droit Comparé- Droits d´Hier, Droits de Demain. Paris: Economica, 1982.
DAVID, René. O Direito Inglês. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1997.
DAVID, René. Os Grandes Sistemas do Direito Contemporâneo. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1986.
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. A History of American Law. New York: Touchstone, 1985.
GARCÍA-PELAYO, Manuel. Derecho Constitucional Comparado. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1984.
GILLMAN, Horward. The constitution besieged. Durham/London: Duke University Press, 1993.
GILMORE, Grant. The Ages of American Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977.
GLENDON, Mary Ann et al. Comparative Legal Traditions. St. Paul: West Group, 1999.
GLENN, H. Patrick. Legal Traditions of the World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
GROSSMAN, George S. (ed.). The Spirit of American Law. Boulder: Westview, 2002.
HALL, Kermit (ed.) The Oxford Guide to United States Supreme Court Decisions. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
HALL, Kermit L. The Magic Mirror – Law in American History. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
HALL, Kermit L. (ed.) The Oxford Companion to American Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
HALL, Kermit L., WIECK, William, M.; FINKELMAN, Paul . American Legal History – Cases and Materials. 2. ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
HORWITZ, Morton. The Transformation of American Law. 2 vols. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
HORWITZ, Morton. The Warren Court and the Pursuit of Justice. New YorK : Hill and Wang, 1999.
HUCKO, Elmar M., The Democratic Tradition- Four German Constitutions, Oxford, New York and Munich: Berg, 1987.
JENNINGS, Ivor. A Constituição Britânica. Brasília: UnB, 1981.
JOHNS, Margaret Z.; PERSCHBACHER, Rex R. The United States Legal System: an introduction. Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2002.
LUTZ, Donald S. The Origins of American Constitutionalism. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1988.
McCLOSKEY, Robert G. The American Surpreme Court. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2000.
MILLER, Charles A. The Supreme Court and the Uses of History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1969.
MONTESQUIEU, Charles Louis de Secondat, Barão de. O Espírito das Leis. Brasília: UNB, 1982.
MONTESQUIEU. Lettres persanes. Paris: GF- Flammarion, 1964.
MONTESQUIEU. The spirit of laws. Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc. n. 38. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc., 1952.
NELSON, William E. Marbury v. Madison- the Origins and Legacy of Judicial Review. Lawrence: The University of Kansas Press, 2000.
SCALIA, Antonin. A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1997.
SCHWARTZ, Bernard. A History of the Supreme Court. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
SCHWARTZ, Herman (ed.). The Rehnquist Court. New York: Hill and Wang, 2002.
SÉROUSSI, Roland. Introduction au Droit Comparé. Paris: Dunod, 2003.
SOARES, Guido Fernandes Silva. Common Law. Introdução ao Direito dos EUA. São Paulo: RT, 1999.
SPANN, Girardeau A. The law of affirmative action. New York: New York University Press, 2000.
STOLLEIS, Michael, History of Social Law in Germany, Berlin- Heidelberg, 2014.
SUNSTEIN, Cass R. One case at a time: judicial minimalism on the Supreme Court. 2ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.
SUNSTEIN, Cass R. The partial constitution. 3ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.
SUSTEIN, Cass. Radical in Robes, Why Extreme Right-Wing Courts are Wrong for America. New York: Basic Books, 2005.
TOCQUEVILLE, Alexis de. Democracy in America. New Cork: Mentor, 1994.
TOCQUEVILLE, Alexis de. Lembranças de 1848- As Jornadas Revolucionárias em Paris. São Paulo: Cia. das Letras, 1991.
TUSHNET, Mark. Taking the Constitution away from the Courts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.
TUSHNET, Mark. The new constitutional order. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2003.
TUSHNET, Mark. A Court Divided- the Rehnquist Court and the Future of Constitutional Law. New York: Norton, 2005.
TUSHNET, Mark. Making Civil Rights Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
WEBER, Max. Law in economy and society. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1967.
WELLINGTON, Harry H. Interpreting the Constitution, The Supreme Court and the Process of Adjudication. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991.
WHITTINGTON, Keith E. Constitutional Interpretation- Textual Meaning, Original Intent and Judicial Review. Lawrence: The University Press of Kansas, 1999.
WOLOCH, Nancy. Muller v. Oregon, a Brief History with Documents. Boston: Bedford, 1996.
ZWEIGERT, Konrad e KOTZ, Hein. Introduction to Comparative Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Arnaldo Sampaio de Moraes Godoy, Juliana Daher Delfino Tesolin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem a Direito, Processo e Cidadania o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta Revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), desde que reconheça e indique a autoria e a publicação inicial nesta Revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer momento depois da conclusão de todo processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
