ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) PROGRAMS: limits in the legal field.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25247/2764-8907.2023.v2n3.p20-32

Keywords:

Legal activities, Computer programs, Artificial intelligence in the legal field, Communicative theory of law

Abstract

The paper shows the importance of taking precautions against attitudes that are in favor of pointing out that the professional activities of judges, lawyers and legal professionals in general, may be carried out / exercised directly or indirectly by the very operation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). This is because the assistance to juridical activities in relation to legal texts (interpretation, application, creation of rules, creation of dogmas and access to the same texts) must be regulated precisely. The reflection is necessary because there are several proposals that apparently contradict this idea; this is the case of the development of "AI programmes" that carry out professional legal activities, since their possible application constitutes a threat to the functioning of the rule of law, as their possible implementation constitutes a threat to the functioning of the rule of law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Fernando Galindo, Universidad de Zaragoza

    Doctor en Derecho. Catedrático de Filosofía del Derecho, Universidad de Zaragoza.

References

ALVES DA SILVA, P. Limites e possibilidades das ferramentas de inteligen̂cia artificial (IA) no poder judiciário. XI Encontro Internacional do Conpedi Chile – Santiago. Direito, governança e novas tecnologias I. Florianópolis: CONPEDI, 2022: p. 98-116.

CARBONELL, M. Funcionalidad de la Constitución y derechos sociales: esbozo de algunos problemas. Estudios Constitucionales, 2008; 6 (2): p. 43-71.

ENGISCH, K. Sentido y alcance de la sistemática jurídica. Anuario de Filosofía del Derecho, 1996; p. 7-41.

EHRLICH, E., Freie Rechtsfindung und freie Rechtswissenschaft (1903). Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1987.

ESSER, J. Grundsatz und Norm in der richterlichen Fortbildung des Privatrechts. Tübingen: Mohr, 1956.

FERRAZ, T. Introdução ao estudo do direito: técnica, decisão, dominação. São Paulo: Atlas, 2003.

FREITAS, J. Sustentabilidade: direito ao futuro. Belo Horizonte: Editora Fórum, 2019.

GADAMER, H. Verdad y Método. Fundamentos de una hermenéutica filosófica. Salamanca: Ediciones Sígueme; 1977.

GALINDO, F. El acceso a textos jurídicos. Introducción práctica a la Filosofía del Derecho. Zaragoza: Mira, 1993.

HABERMAS, J. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Volumen I. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp, 1981. HABERMAS, J. En la espiral de la tecnocracia. Madrid: Trotta, 2016.

MATURANA, H. VARELA, F. El árbol del conocimiento. Santiago de Chile: OEA/Editorial Universitaria, 1984.

MONTESQUIEU, C. L'Esprit des Lois et la querelle de l'esprit des lois. En: MONTESQUIEU, C. Oeuvres complètes. París: Ed. du Seuil, 1964.

PERELMAN, CH; OLBRECHTS TYTECA, L. Tratado de la argumentación. La nueva retórica. Madrid: Gredos, 1989.

REALE, M. Filosofia do direito. São Paulo: Editora Saraiva, 2002.

ROBLES, G. Cinco estudios de teoría comunicacional del derecho. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Olejnik, 2018.

ROBLES, G. Teoría del derecho. Fundamentos de teoría comunicacional del derecho. Volumen III. Navarra: Aranzadi, 2021.

VIEHWEG, T. Tópica y Jurisprudencia. Madrid: Taurus, 1964. ZIPPELIUS, R. Rechtsphilosophie. München: Beck, 1994.

Published

2023-10-16

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

GALINDO, Fernando. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) PROGRAMS: limits in the legal field. Direito, Processo e Cidadania, Recife, PE, Brasil, v. 2, n. 3, p. 20–32, 2023. DOI: 10.25247/2764-8907.2023.v2n3.p20-32. Disponível em: https://www1.unicap.br/ojs/index.php/dpc/article/view/2470.. Acesso em: 16 may. 2024.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 53

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.