Leibnizian metaphysics and being for self in Hegel's Science of Logic

Authors

  • Carlo Paim Peralta Pontifícia Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25247/P1982-999X.2022.v22n2.p69-87

Keywords:

Hegel, Leibniz, Being for self, One, Monad

Abstract

The present article deals with the chapter Being for self of Hegel's Science of Logic and the dialogue implied therein with Leibnizian philosophy. In the development of the category of being for self, which completes the movement of quality and establishes the transition to quantity in the Doctrine of Being of the Science of Logic, Hegel exposes the dialectic between the one and the multiple, in addition to introducing observations about Leibnizian philosophy. The objective of this article is to make an appreciation of the chapters Leibniz, from the Lectures on the History of Philosophy, and Being for itself, from the Science of Logic, in order to, by relating them, better understand how Leibnizian philosophy is understood in the context of the to be for self, and how through this Hegel intends to have overcome it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Carlo Paim Peralta, Pontifícia Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul

    Possui graduação em Medicina Veterinária pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) e mestrado em Filosofia pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS). Áreas de interesse em Medicina Veterinária: medicina de felinos domésticos, clínica de pequenos animais, anestesiologia. Áreas de interesse em Filosofia: metafísica, idealismo, dialética, filosofia da linguagem.

References

BURBIDGE, J. W. Historical dictionary of Hegelian philosophy. Maryland: Scarecrow Press Inc., 2008.

BURBIDGE, J. W. The Logic of Hegel’s Logic. Ontario: Broadview Press, 2006.

HEGEL, G. W. F. Ciência da Lógica: a Doutrina do Ser. Tradução de Christian G. Iber e Federico Orsini. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes LTDa., 2016, v. 1.

HEGEL, G. W. F. Hegel’s Lectures on the History of Philosophy. Tradução de E. S. Haldane e F. H. Simson. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., 1955, v. 3.

HÖSLE, V. Is There Progress in the History of Philosophy? In: DUQUETTE, D. A. Hegel’s History of Philosophy: New Interpretations. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003. p. 185-204.

KUSCH, M; MANNINEN, J. Hegel on Modalities and Monadology. In: KNUTTILA, S. Modern Modalities: Studies of the History of Modal Theories from Medieval Nominalism to Logical Positivism. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998. p. 109-177.

LEIBNIZ, G. W. Philosophical Papers and Letters. Tradição de Leroy E. Loemker. London: Klower Academic Publishers, 1989.

MCTAGGART, J. M. E. A Commentary on Hegel’s Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1910.

NUZZO, A. Hegel’s Method for a History of Philosophy: The Berlin Introductions to the Lectures on the History of Philosophy (1819-1831). In: DUQUETTE, D. A. Hegel’s History of Philosophy: New Interpretations. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003, p. 19-34.

TABAK, M. The Doctrine of Being in Hegel’s Science of Logic: A Critical Comentary. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.

WINFIELD, R. D. Hegel’s Science of Logic: A Critical Rethinking in Thirty Lectures. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2012.

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

PERALTA, Carlo Paim. Leibnizian metaphysics and being for self in Hegel’s Science of Logic . Revista Ágora Filosófica, Recife, PE, Brasil, v. 22, n. 2, p. 69–87, 2022. DOI: 10.25247/P1982-999X.2022.v22n2.p69-87. Disponível em: https://www1.unicap.br/ojs/index.php/agora/article/view/2206.. Acesso em: 18 may. 2024.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 307

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.