The thoughtfulness of photography and politics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25247/P1982-999X.2025.v25n3.p24-42Keywords:
Rancière, Politics, Aisthesis, Photography, thoughtfulnessAbstract
This research investigates, in Jacques Rancière's thought, whether pensiveness constitutes the political character of photography. The study is part of the aesthetic regime of art, the only one where the image becomes pensive. For Rancière, politics emerges from the disruption of the established order by the distribution of the sensible, being consubstantial with aesthetics. The central hypothesis is that photography is political in its nature because it is pensive. This pensiveness results from the paradox between the enigma and the social banality coexisting in the image. The specific objectives are: to present Rancière's notion of politics; to analyze the relationship between the distribution of the sensible and the aesthetic regime; and to investigate the photography-pensiveness-politics triad. The methodology consists of a bibliographic review of the philosopher's works (primary sources) and his commentators, such as Daniela Blanco and Eduardo Pellejero (secondary sources), adopting the theoretical approach of the “scene.” The topic is relevant to understanding the implications of aesthetics and politics in contemporary society.
Downloads
References
BARTHES, Roland. A câmara clara: nota sobre a fotografia. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 1984.
CARMONA HURTADO, J. A imagem como potência de reflexão. In: Viso: Cadernos de Estética Aplicada, Campina Grande, v. XI, n. 20, p. 99-113, jan./jun. 2017.
BLANCO, Daniela Cunha. Para além das utopias: Rancière e as imagens heterotópicas. In: Viso: Cadernos de estética aplicada. n. 27, nota 7, p. 92-127, jul./dez., 2020. Disponível em: http://revistaviso.com.br. Acesso em: 3 ago. 2021.
BRITO, Pedro Gomes Dias. Uma questão de corpos: a fotografia de José Medeiros e Marcel Gautherot sob o signo da palavra muda. Dissertação (Mestrado em Letras) - Departamento de Estudos Literários da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte/MG. 2019.
FOUCAULT, Michel. O corpo utópico, as heterotopias. Tradução: Salma Tannus Michail. São Paulo: n-1 Edições, 2013.
HOULLOU, J. R. Z.; JULIANO, D. B. R. O paradoxo do espectador em Rancière. Crítica Cultural (Critic), Palhoça, v. 8, n. 2, p. 417-424, jul./dez. 2013.
MOTA, Vladimir de Oliva. Rancière e a consubstancialidade da política à arte no regime estético. Ética e Filosofia política: Interlocuções entre a modernidade e a contemporaneidade, República do Livro, São Paulo, p. 153-172, 2020.
PELLEJERO, E. A. Ethos, Decoro, Liberdade: Notas sobre os regimes de identificação das artes na obra de Jacques Rancière. Dialectiké, v. 2, p. 19-35, 2016.
RAMOS, Pedro Hussak van Velthen. Rancière: a política das imagens. Princípio: Revista de filosofia, Natal, v. 19, n. 32, jul.dez. 2012, p. 95-107, 2012.
RAMOS, Pedro Hussak van Velthen. O destino das imagens. Tradução: Mônica Costa Netto; Tadeu Capistrano (org.). Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, 2012. (ArteFíssil).
RANCIÈRE. Jacques. A estética como política. DEVIRES – Cinema e Humanidades, Belo Horizonte, v. 7, n. 2, p. 14-36, 2010.
RANCIÈRE. Jacques. O destino das imagens. Tradução: Mônica Costa Netto; Tadeu Capistrano (org.). Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, 2012. (ArteFíssil).
RANCIÈRE. Jacques. O espectador emancipado. Tradução: Ivone C. Benedetti. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2014.
RANCIÈRE. Jacques. Políticas da escrita. 2. ed. Tradução: Raquel Ramalhete, Laís Eleonora Vilanova, Ligia Vassalo e Eloisa Araújo Ribeiro. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2017.
VOIGT, André Fabiano; MARTINS, Miriam Mendonça. Arte, imagem e fotografia: um diálogo possível entre Roland Barthes, Walter Benjamin e Jacques Rancière. Oficina do Historiador, Porto Alegre, EDIPUCRS, v. 9, n. 1, p. 250-264, jan./jun. 2016.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Clara Leite Lisboa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant Ágora Filosófica the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the work to be shared with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to enter into additional agreements separately for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), provided that they acknowledge and indicate the authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any time after the completion of the entire editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
