THE INTEGRATION OF FAITH, TEACHING, AND LEARNING (IFEA) IN ADVENTIST EDUCATION
AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING IN THE SCHOOL CONTEXT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25247/paralellus.2026.v17n40.p291-309Keywords:
Argumentative Writing, Integral Formation, Religious Studies, Science and Religion, Science EducationAbstract
This study analyzes the Integration of Faith, Teaching and Learning (IFEA) as a pedagogical mediation in the development of argumentative writing and the integral formation of elementary school students. Grounded in the understanding of religion as a symbolic and constitutive dimension of human experience, the research investigates how the intentional articulation between a biblical narrative, experimental science teaching, and structured writing based on the Claim–Evidence–Reasoning (CER) model impacts scientific reasoning and meaning-making processes. This qualitative study was conducted in a confessional school with 51 fifth-grade students. Data were produced through written texts, questionnaires, and classroom observations, and analyzed using content analysis procedures. The findings indicate that 78.4% of the students demonstrated consistent argumentative structure (Scientific and Hybrid profiles), suggesting that the integration of faith and teaching does not compromise empirical rigor but rather enhances causal reasoning and meaningful learning. The emergence of argumentative profiles articulating scientific rationality and transcendence reflects a model of critical integration between science and religion. The study concludes that IFEA contributes to integral formation by fostering epistemologically consistent dialogue between science, religion, and education, offering empirical contributions to the field of Religious Studies.
Downloads
References
AUSUBEL, David Paul. Aquisição e retenção de conhecimentos: uma perspectiva cognitiva. Lisboa: Plátano, 2000.
BARBOUR, Ian G. Quando a ciência encontra a religião: inimigas, estranhas ou parceiras? São Paulo: Cultrix, 2004.
BARDIN, Laurence. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2016.
FOWLER, James W. Stages of faith: the psychology of human development and the quest for meaning. San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1992.
MCNEILL, Katherine L.; KRAJCIK, Joseph S. Scientific explanations: characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 45, n. 1, p. 53–78, 2008.
OSBORNE, Jonathan; ERDURAN, Sibel; SIMON, Shirley. Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 41, n. 10, p. 994–1020, 2004.
TOULMIN, Stephen. Os usos do argumento. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.
YAMAMOTO, S. et al. Escrita argumentativa e aprendizagem no ensino de ciências. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 2022.
ZEMBAL-SAUL, Carolyn; MCNEILL, Katherine L.; HERSHBERGER, Kimberly. What’s your evidence? Engaging K–12 students in constructing explanations in science. Boston: Pearson, 2012.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Francisco Luiz Gomes de Carvalho, Naylan Saltarelli , Francislê Neri de Souza

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
A submissão de originais para a Paralellus implica a transferência, pelos autores, dos direitos de publicação eletrônica. Os direitos autorais para os artigos veiculados neste periódico são do autor; todavia, são da revista os direitos sobre a primeira publicação. Os autores somente poderão fazer uso dos mesmos resultados em outras publicações se indicarem, claramente, que a Paralellus foi o meio originalmente utilizado. Em decorrência do fato de ser a Paralellus uma revista de acesso público, é permitida a utilização gratuita dos artigos em aplicações educacionais e/ou científicas não comerciais, desde que respeitando-se a exigência de citação da fonte (Texto atualizado em 16-11-2020).

















