The relationship between Satisfaction and Interest related to the Aesthetic Judgment in Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25247/P1982-999X.2024.v24n1.p48-63Keywords:
Immanuel Kant, aesthetic, aesthetic judgment, judgment of taste, satisfaction and interestAbstract
This article aims to present a reading of the first paragraphs of Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment and the conceptualization about the beauty, pleasurable and good, and the relation there is between satisfaction and interest in the judgment of taste. Its motivation is due to the philosophical relevance that both the author and the topic represent in the framework of the philosophical renewal of his time and nowadays. With this central intention, this work seeks to disclose, in an explanatory way, all logical chains of the proposed Kantian thinking, to facilitate its understanding. The content was exposed based on a hermeneutic analysis of the book Critique of the Power of Judgment. As a result of the research, an excellent logical link was observed in the author's argument, defending the thinking about the judgment of taste and an expert work of conceptualization regarding beauty, pleasant and good. This research concludes by revealing that many of the aesthetic relations presented can be associated to both the faculty of thinking and the feeling developed between object and subject; thus, making it possible the advance of the research to a more comprehensive topic.
Downloads
References
BRAGA, Eduardo Cardoso. As características do julgamento acerca do belo segundo Kant. Disponível em: http://www.edubraga.pro.br/estetica-aesthetics/as-caracteristicas-do-julgamento-acerca-do-belo-segundo-kant/. Acesso em: 29 out. 2020.
DAMASCENO, Julie Christie. A estética kantiana: o belo, o sublime e a arte. Disponível em: file:///C:/Users/Usu%C3%A1rio/Downloads/18840-Texto%20do%20artigo-95302-1-10-20160329.PDF. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2020.
KANT, Immanuel. Crítica da faculdade de julgar. Tradução: Fernando Costa Mattos. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2016.
KANT, Immanuel. Crítica da faculdade de julgar. Tradução: Fernando Costa Mattos. Bragança Paulista: Editora Universitária São Francisco, 2016.
PERES, Daniel Tourinho. Juízo estético, juízo político e imaginação em Kant. Disponível em: https://blog.ufba.br/kant/files/2010/02/Ju%C3%ADzo-Est%C3%A9tico-Ju%C3%ADzo-Pol%C3%ADtico-e-Imagina%C3%A7%C3%A3o-em-Kant.pdf. Acesso em: 15 out. 2020.
SANTOS, Rone E. Sobre o lugar do juízo de gosto na estética kantiana. Disponível em: https://ufsj.edu.br/portal2-repositorio/File/existenciaearte/Edicoes/3_Edicao/Rone%20E%20Santos%20FILOSOFIA.pdf . Acesso em: 3 nov. 2020.
SANTOS, Leonel Ribeiro. A concepção kantiana da experiência estética: novidades, tensões e equilíbrios. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/pdf/trans/v33n2/v33n2a04.pdf. Acesso em: 20 out. 2020.
SENA, Carolina Miranda. Filosofia da arte e teoria estética: um debate entre Hegel em Kant. Disponível em: file:///C:/Users/Usu%C3%A1rio/Downloads/9325-Texto%20do%20artigo-30336-1-10-20191016.pdf. Acessado em: 28 dez.2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ítalo Rafael França Rio Tinto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
