Hegelian logic as an argument for the cosmopolitan project
from the category of limit to the dialectic of repulsion-attraction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25247/P1982-999X.2022.v22n2.p31-49Keywords:
Dialectics, Cosmopolitanism, Science of Logic. , Political Philosophy, International Relations TheoryAbstract
This article aims to constitute an argument to the cosmopolitan project starting from the category of limit, present in Hegel's Doctrine of Being in the Science of Logic. Through the speculative-dialectical method, the meaning of limit in Hegelian logic will be initially developed, observing its potential application to political philosophy. However, we perceive an insufficiency in the limit, which in its determination demands the category of barrier. It will demand the dialectic of repulsion-attraction for the conception of the relation between the multiple and the one. It is in this relation that resides the cosmopolitan argument sought. In a parallel way, the central guidelines of a cosmopolitan project will be highlighted to be able to couple the determinations from the category of limit to an argument in defense of cosmopolitanism.
Downloads
References
BAVARESCO, Agemir. A crise do Estado-Nação e a teoria da soberania em Hegel. In: Sociedade em Debate, Pelotas, n.7, v.3, pp.77-109, 2001.
BUBNER, Rüdiger. Moralité et Sittlichkeit – sur l’origine d’une opposition. In: Revue International de Philosophie, Bruxelles, v. 42, n. 166, pp. 341–360, 1988.
FOCSANEANU, Lazar. Esquisse d´un droit international sans obligation ni sanction. Un essai de droit des gens phénoménologique. In: Études Internationales, Québec, v.8, n.3, pp.447-477, 1977.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. A constelação pós-nacional: ensaios políticos. São Paulo: Littera Mundi, 2001.
HEGEL, Georg W. F. Ciência da lógica: 1. A doutrina do ser. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2016.
HEGEL, Georg W. F. Ciência da lógica: 3. A doutrina do conceito. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2018.
HEGEL, Georg W. F. Fenomenologia do Espírito. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2014.
HEGEL, Georg W. F. Introdução à filosofia do direito. Tradução de Paulo Meneses, Agemir Bavaresco et al. São Leopoldo: Ed.UNISINOS, 2010.
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Being and Time. New York: Harper & Row, 2008.
HONNETH, Axel. Luta por reconhecimento: a gramática moral dos conflitos sociais. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2003.
KANT, Immanuel. Crítica da Razão Pura. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 2017.
KANT, Immanuel. Ideia de uma história universal de um ponto de vista cosmopolita. Tradução de Rodrigo Naves e Ricardo Terra. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1986.
KANT, Immanuel. Metafísica dos Costumes: princípios metafísicos da Doutrina do Direito. Tradução de Artur Morão. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2004.
KANT, Immanuel. Para a paz perpétua. Tradução de Bárbara Kristensen. Rianxo: Instituto Galego de Estudos de Segurança Internacional e da Paz, 2006.
KERVÉGAN, Jean-François. Le problème de la fondation de l´éthique: Kant, Hegel. In : Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, vol. 95, n. 1, pp. 33-55, 1990.
LEIBNIZ, Gottfried W. Monadología. Oviedo: Pentalfa Ediciones, 1981.
NOUR, Soraya. Os Cosmopolitas. Kant e os “temas kantianos” em Relações Internacionais. In: Contexto Internacional, Rio de Janeiro, v.25, n.1, pp.7-46, 2003.
PLATÃO. Parmênides. Texto de John Burnet, tradução de Maura Iglésias e Fernando Rodrigues. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. PUC Rio/São Paulo: Loyola, 2003.
THOMPSON, Kevin. Hegel's Theory of Normativity: The Systematic Foundations of the Philosophical Science of Right. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2019.
WATSON, Adam. A evolução da Sociedade Internacional. Brasília: UnB, 2004.
ZANELLA, Diego. A origem do conceito de cosmopolitismo. In: Hypnos, São Paulo, v.32, n.1, pp.166-176, 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Ágora Filosófica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
