Pragmatic ambiguity and Kripke’s dialogue against Donnellan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25247/P1982-999X.2019.v19n1.p103-134Palabras clave:
Assertion. Charity Principle. Definite Descriptions. Reference. Speech Acts.Resumen
In this paper I discuss Donnellan’s claim of the pragmatic ambiguity of the distinction between referential and attributive uses of definite des-criptions. The literature on the topic is huge and full of alternative analysis. I will restrict myself to a very classical topos: the challenge posed by Kripke to Donnellan’s distinction with the case of a dialogue on an attempt to update a misdescription. I claim that to treat the problem of the referential use of definite descriptions we need not only to take into account the context of utterance, but also the cognitive context with its epistemic restrictions and the possible different contexts of reception of the same utterance. I try to show different aspects of what can be called “pragmatic ambiguity”, which seem not correctly considered by Kripke, and connect them to the basic tenets of Grice Cooperative principle.
Descargas
Referencias
Bach K. 2007, “Referentially used Descriptions: a Reply to Devitt”, European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 3/2: 33-48.
Benzi M.; Penco C. “Defeasible Arguments and Context Dependence” in Paradigmi, 36/3: 561-577
Bezuidenhout M. and Reimer M. 2004 (eds.), Descriptions and Beyond, Oxford, Oxford U.P.
Brandom R., 1994, Making it Explicit, Haervard, Harvard University Press,
Buchanan R., Ostertag G. 2005, “Has the Problem of Incompletness Rested on a Mistake?”, Mind, vol.114, 456 (889-913).
Capuano A. 2016, “A New Account of the Referential/Attributive Distinction and its Semantic Nature”, in Bianchi A., Morato V., and Spolaore G., eds., The Importance of Being Called Ernesto. Reference, Truth, and Logical Form, Padova: University Press.
Devitt, M., 2004, “The case for referential descriptions”, in Bezuidenhout M. and Reimer M.: 280-305.
Donnellan K. 1966, “Reference and Definite Descriptions”, Philosophical Review, 75 (261-230).
Kaplan D. 2005, “Reading ‘On Denoting’ on its centenary”, Mind, 114/456: 933-1003.
Korta K. and Perry J. 2011, Critical Pragmatics: An inquiry into Reference and Communication, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kripke S. 1975, “Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference”, in French P.A., Uehling T.E., Wettstein H.K. (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, Univ. of Minnesota Press.
Kripke S. 2005, “Russell's notion of Scope”, Mind, vol.114, 456 (1005-1037).
Linsky L. 1963, “Reference and Referents”, in Caton C. (ed.), Philosophy and Ordinary Language, Urbana.
Liston M. 2007 (ed.) European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, issue on “Descriptions, their content, uses, and historical significance”, 3/2
Neale S. 2004, “This, That, and the Other”, in Bezuidenhout M. and Reimer M.: 68-182.
Neale S. 2005 “A century Later”, introduction to Mind, 114/456: 809–871
Neale S. 2006, "Descriptions", in M. Devitt - R. Hanley (eds), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language.
Neale S. 2016, “Silent Refernce”, in G. Ostertag, (ed.) Meanings and Other Things: Essays in Honor of Stephen Schiffer. Oxford Univ Pres, p. 229-344.
Penco C. 2010, “Essentially Incomplete Descriptions”, European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 6: 47.66.
Penco C. 2017, “Donnellan’s misdescriptions and Loose Talk”, in Maria Ponte & Kepa Korta editors, Reference and Representation in Language and Thought, Oxford U.P.
Predelli S. Schiffer S. 1995 “Descriptions, Indexicals and Belief Reports”, Mind, 104 (107-131).
Soames S. 2005 “Why Incomplete Definite Descriptions do not Defeat Russell’s Theory of Descriptions”, in Teorema, Vol. XXIV/3: 7-30
Stalnaker R. 1970, “Pragmatics”, in Synthese 22: 272-289.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Usted es libre de:
- Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente.
- Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente.
- La licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia
Bajo los siguientes términos:
- Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada , brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios . Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
- No hay restricciones adicionales — No puede aplicar términos legales ni medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otras a hacer cualquier uso permitido por la licencia.
Avisos:
No tiene que cumplir con la licencia para elementos del materiale en el dominio público o cuando su uso esté permitido por una excepción o limitación aplicable.
No se dan garantías. La licencia podría no darle todos los permisos que necesita para el uso que tenga previsto. Por ejemplo, otros derechos como publicidad, privacidad, o derechos morales pueden limitar la forma en que utilice el material.
