Conflict Mediation as Public Policy

Advances and Setbacks

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25247/2764-8907.2022.v1n3.p124-151

Keywords:

judicial public policy, Conflict resolution methods

Abstract

This article presents reflections on the issue of Resolution 125 of the National Council of Justice in 2010, which established the National Judiciary Policy for adequate treatment of conflicts of interest within the Brazilian Judiciary. It aims, in particular, to point out the advances in the use of mediation and conciliation, as well as the guidelines of this resolution and its impacts both in the judicial and private spheres. To this end, it makes use of the deductive method in the socio-legal scope, with the presentation of the sections: the objectives of the Resolution 125 of the CNJ; the first years; the facilitators; the growth of mediation; judicial and private mediation; The Global Pandemic and the use of technologies, brief considerations on the current legislation; to then present the final considerations with punctual aspects of what can improve in screen after the sanction of the Civil Procedure Code of 2015 and the Mediation Law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Douglas Alexander Prado, Universidade da Amazônia

    Mediator, Lawyer; Partner of DAP Conflicts Management, Master in Fundamental Rights - UNAMA, Specialist in Civil Law and Civil Procedural Law, Business Manager (Customer Service Specialist), Business and Contract Negotiator certified by ADRcenter- Jams International and NW University, Mediation and Conciliation Instructor, Behavioral Analyst, Arbitrator and Mediator of the Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration Chamber of Rio de Janeiro (CCMA-RJ), Arbitrator and Mediator of the Câmara Arbitral de Tucuruí e Região (PA), Mediator of CAMES (Câmara de Mediação e Arbitragem Especializada), Trained Conciliator and Mediator by the Escola Superior da Advocacia da OAB/SP, Trained in Judicial Mediation by the Conselho Nacional de Justiça/TJDFT, Trained in Mediation by Defamília - Strategies for Business Families (SP) and by Centro de Mediación Mediaras (Buenos Aires-AR), Mediator certified by CONIMA (National Council of Mediation and Arbitration Institutions), Mediator and Conciliator Member of the Judiciary Center of Conflict Resolution and Citizenship (CEJUSC/TJSP), Mediator belonging to the National Registry of Judicial Mediators and Conciliators of CNJ, Supervisor of Mediators and Conciliators, Trained in Mediation and Arbitration by Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Trained in Corporate Arbitration and Mediation by Instituto de Mediação e Arbitragem do Brasil - IMAB, Capacitated in Didactics of Teaching in Mediation, Capacitated in Didactics of Higher Education, Capacitated in Transmediation by AD Transmediações, Capacitated in body language studies by Pease International, Member of the Commission of Advocacy in Mediation and Conciliation of the OAB/SP, Vice-President of the Commission of Conciliation, Mediation of the OAB/PA, Member of the Board of Mediators of ALGI Mediation and Training LTDA. , Member of the Mediators Board of Centro de Mediadores - Brasília-DF. Professor of Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration Courses.

     

  • Carla Noura Teixeira, Universidade da Amazônia - UNAMA

    Doutora em Direito do Estado pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. Professora do Programa de Pós-graduação Stricto Sensu Mestrado em Direitos Fundamentais da Universidade da Amazônia - UNAMA/ Grupo Ser Educacional. Professora da Graduação em Direito da UNIFAMAZ e da UNAMA. Advogada.

References

ALMEIDA, Tania. Mediação de Conflitos: para iniciantes, praticantes e docentes / Coordenadoras Tanoa Almeida, Samanta Pelajo e Eva Jonathan – Salvador: Ed. JusPodivm, 2016.

ALMEIDA, Tania. Tribunal Multiportas: investindo no capital social para maximizar o sistema de solução de conflitos no Brasil / Organizadores: Rafael Alves de Almeida, Tania Almeida, Mariana Hernandez Crespo. – Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV, 2012.

AMORIM, José Roberto Neves (Coord.). A Nova Ordem das Soluções Alternativas de Conflitos e o Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Brasília. Gazeta Jurídica, 2013.

BRAGA NETO, ADOLFO. Aspectos Atuais sobre a Mediação e Outros Métodos Extra e Judiciais de Resolução de Conflitos. Rio de Janeiro: GZ Editora, 2012.

BRAGA NETO, ADOLFO. Mediação: uma experiência brasileira. São Paulo: CLA editora, 2017.

CARAM, María Elena. Mediación: diseño de uma práctica / Maria Elena Caram; Diana Teresa Elbaum; Matilde Risolia – 1ª ed – Buenos Aires: Librería Histórica, 2010.

DIOGUARDI, Juana. Manual de Medición. – 1ª ed. – Ezeiza: Huella, 2014.

DIEZ, F.; TAPIA, G. Herramientas para trabajar en mediación. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 1999.

ECHEVERRÍA, Rafael. Ontología del Lenguaje. Buenos Aires: Granica; Juan Carlos Saez Editor, 2012.

GRINOVER, A.P.; WATANABE, K.; LAGRASTA NETO, C.(Coord.). Mediação e gerenciamento do processo: revolução na prestação jurisdicional: guia pratico para a instalação do setor de conciliação e mediação. São Paulo: Atlas, 2007.

GROSMAN, C. F.; MANDELBAUM, H. G. Mediação no Judiciário: teoria na prática, prática na Teoria. São Paulo: Primavera Editorial, 2011.

HIGHTON, ELENA I., ÁLVAREZ GLADYS S. Mediación para Resolver Conflictos. Buenos Aires - Argentina: AD-HOC, 2008.

PELUSO, C., RICHA, M., GRINOVER,, A., WATANABE, K., Conciliação e Mediação: Estrutura da Política Judiciária Nacional. CNJ. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Forense, 2011.

SAMPAIO, L.R.C.; NETO, A.B. O que é mediação de conflitos. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 2007.

SCHNITMAN, D. F.; LITTLEJOHN, S. Novos paradigmas em mediação. Porto Alegre, RS: Editora Artes Médicas Sul Ltda,1999.

Published

2022-12-07

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

PRADO, Douglas Alexander; TEIXEIRA, Carla Noura. Conflict Mediation as Public Policy: Advances and Setbacks. Direito, Processo e Cidadania, Recife, PE, Brasil, v. 1, n. 3, p. 124–151, 2022. DOI: 10.25247/2764-8907.2022.v1n3.p124-151. Disponível em: https://www1.unicap.br/ojs/index.php/dpc/article/view/2144.. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2024.