Discourse and Political Ontology
an analysis of some assumptions of Ernesto Laclau´s Political Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25247/P1982-999X.2022.v22n1.p152-175Keywords:
Laclau, Political Ontology, Discourse Theory, HegemonyAbstract
The principal objective of this article is to analyze the concept of discourse as developed by Ernesto Laclau in order to clarify certain assumptions of his political theory. By taking the concept of discourse as its starting point, the article intends to develop the relationship between discourse theory and political ontology, and how Laclau´s position reframe some assumptions of Marxism through a meticulous assimilation of certain theoretical tenets of post-structuralism philosophy, mainly Derrida and Foucault. Finally, the development of the relationship between discourse theory and political ontology also allows to clarify another relevant relationship within Laclau´s work, which is the connection between the social and the political.
Downloads
References
DELUCA, Kevin. Articulation Theory: A Discursive Grounding for Rhetorical Practice. Philosophy & Rhetoric, v. 32, n. 4, p. 334–348, 1999.
DUVERGER, Maurice. The Study of Politics. London: Thomas Nelson, 1972.
FOUCAULT, Michel. A Ordem do Discurso. 24. ed. São Paulo: Edições Loyola, 1995.
GLYNOS, Jacob; HOWARTH, David. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. 1. ed. London: Routledge, 2007.
LACLAU, Ernesto. The Impossibility of Society. In: LACLAU, Ernesto. New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso, 1990. p. 89–92.
LACLAU, Ernesto. Universalism, Particularism and the Question of Identity. In: LACLAU, Ernesto. Emancipation(s). London: Verso, 1995. p. 20–35.
LACLAU, Ernesto. Identity and Hegemony: The Role of Universality in the Constitution of Political Logics. In: LACLAU, Ernesto; ŽIŽEK, Slavoj; BUTLER, Judith. Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the left. Phronesis. London: Verso, 2000. p. 44–89.
LACLAU, Ernesto. Articulation and the Limits of Metaphor. In: LACLAU, Ernesto. The Rhetorical Foundations of Society. London: Verso, 2014. p. 53–78.
LACLAU, Ernesto. Discourse (1993). In: HOWARTH, David R. (Org). Ernesto Laclau: Post-Marxism, Populism, and Critique. London: Routledge, 2015. p. 23–29.
LACLAU, Ernesto; MOUFFE, Chantal. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso, 1985.
LEFORT, Claude. Democracy and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.
MENDONÇA, Daniel de. A Teoria da Hegemonia de Ernesto Laclau e a Análise Política Brasileira. Ciências Sociais Unisinos, v. 43, n. 3, p. 49–258, 2007.
MENDONÇA, Daniel de. Antagonismo como identificação política. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, n. 9, p. 205–228, dez. 2012.
MENDONÇA, Daniel De. O fundamento como fundamento ausente nas ciências sociais: Heidegger, Derrida, Laclau. Sociologias, v. 18, n. 41, p. 164–194, 2016.
TORFING, Jacob. New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Ágora Filosófica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.