Discourse and Political Ontology
an analysis of some assumptions of Ernesto Laclau´s Political Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25247/P1982-999X.2022.v22n1.p152-175Keywords:
Laclau, Political Ontology, Discourse Theory, HegemonyAbstract
The principal objective of this article is to analyze the concept of discourse as developed by Ernesto Laclau in order to clarify certain assumptions of his political theory. By taking the concept of discourse as its starting point, the article intends to develop the relationship between discourse theory and political ontology, and how Laclau´s position reframe some assumptions of Marxism through a meticulous assimilation of certain theoretical tenets of post-structuralism philosophy, mainly Derrida and Foucault. Finally, the development of the relationship between discourse theory and political ontology also allows to clarify another relevant relationship within Laclau´s work, which is the connection between the social and the political.
Downloads
References
DELUCA, Kevin. Articulation Theory: A Discursive Grounding for Rhetorical Practice. Philosophy & Rhetoric, v. 32, n. 4, p. 334–348, 1999.
DUVERGER, Maurice. The Study of Politics. London: Thomas Nelson, 1972.
FOUCAULT, Michel. A Ordem do Discurso. 24. ed. São Paulo: Edições Loyola, 1995.
GLYNOS, Jacob; HOWARTH, David. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. 1. ed. London: Routledge, 2007.
LACLAU, Ernesto. The Impossibility of Society. In: LACLAU, Ernesto. New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso, 1990. p. 89–92.
LACLAU, Ernesto. Universalism, Particularism and the Question of Identity. In: LACLAU, Ernesto. Emancipation(s). London: Verso, 1995. p. 20–35.
LACLAU, Ernesto. Identity and Hegemony: The Role of Universality in the Constitution of Political Logics. In: LACLAU, Ernesto; ŽIŽEK, Slavoj; BUTLER, Judith. Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the left. Phronesis. London: Verso, 2000. p. 44–89.
LACLAU, Ernesto. Articulation and the Limits of Metaphor. In: LACLAU, Ernesto. The Rhetorical Foundations of Society. London: Verso, 2014. p. 53–78.
LACLAU, Ernesto. Discourse (1993). In: HOWARTH, David R. (Org). Ernesto Laclau: Post-Marxism, Populism, and Critique. London: Routledge, 2015. p. 23–29.
LACLAU, Ernesto; MOUFFE, Chantal. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso, 1985.
LEFORT, Claude. Democracy and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.
MENDONÇA, Daniel de. A Teoria da Hegemonia de Ernesto Laclau e a Análise Política Brasileira. Ciências Sociais Unisinos, v. 43, n. 3, p. 49–258, 2007.
MENDONÇA, Daniel de. Antagonismo como identificação política. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, n. 9, p. 205–228, dez. 2012.
MENDONÇA, Daniel De. O fundamento como fundamento ausente nas ciências sociais: Heidegger, Derrida, Laclau. Sociologias, v. 18, n. 41, p. 164–194, 2016.
TORFING, Jacob. New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Ágora Filosófica

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant Ágora Filosófica the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the work to be shared with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to enter into additional agreements separately for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), provided that they acknowledge and indicate the authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any time after the completion of the entire editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).













