The objectuality of the object
an attempt to grounding an ontology in Immanuel Kant’s thinking via Martin Heidegger
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25247/P1982-999X.2022.v22n3.p56-76Keywords:
Metaphysics, Doctrine of the transcendentals, Objectuality, Object, DogmaticsAbstract
The philosophical tradition says that Immanuel Kant’s critique of the theoretical reason is an attempt to epistemological foundation. The model is based on the relationship between subject and object and aims to determine the limits of the possibility of knowledge. This would follow from the Kantian denial to the pure metaphysical intelligibility. Such ontology, however, would not focus on the naming of pure objects or pure intelligibility. It is then intended to debate the possibility of a transcendental ontology that is based on the objectuality of empirical objects, which points to the Heideggerian interpretation of Kantian thought. Thus, this paper hopes to contribute to the theme of the possibility of a Kantian ontology with view to the objectuality of the objects.
Downloads
References
ADORNO, Theodor W. Kant’s critique of pure reason. Tradução de Rodney Livingstone. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001.
AERTSEN, Jan A. Medieval philosophy and the transcendentals: the case of Thomas Aquinas. Leiden: Brill, 1996.
AMERIKS, Karl. The critique of metaphysics: Kant and traditional ontology. In: GUYER, Paul (Ed.). The Cambridge companion to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. p. 249-279.
ASCHENBRENNER, Karl. A companion to Kant‘s critique of pure reason: transcendental aesthetic and analytic. Lanham: University Press of America, 1983.
BONACCINI, Juan A. Sobre o projeto kantiano de uma filosofia transcendental. Educação e Filosofia, Uberlândia, v. 27, n. especial, p. 211-232, 2013. Disponível em: <http://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/EducacaoFilosofia/article/view/22776/12733>. Acesso em: 12 out. 2022.
COURTINE, Jean-François. Suarez et le système de la métaphysique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1990.
EISLER, Rudolf. Kant-Lexikon: Nachschlagewerk zu Kants sämtlichen Schriften, Briefen und handschriftlichem Nachlass. Hildesheim: Georg OLMS Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1964.
GILSON, Etienne. A filosofia na Idade Média. Tradução de Eduardo Brandão. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1995.
GOBRY, Ivan. Vocabulário grego da filosofia. Tradução de Ivone C. Benedetti. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2007.
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Einleitung in die Phänomenologie der Religion. In: HEIDEGGER, Martin. Phänomenologie des religiösen Lebens. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1995 [1920/21]. (Gesamtausgabe, 60).
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. 6. ed. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1998 [1928]. (Gesamtausgabe, 3).
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Kants These über das Sein. In: HEIDEGGER, Martin. Wegmarken. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1976 [1961]. p. 445-480. (Gesamtausgabe, 9).
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Logik: die Frage nach der Wahrheit. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1976 [1925/26]. (Gesamtausgabe, 21).
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Logik im Ausgang von Leibniz. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1978 [1928]. (Gesamtausgabe, 26).
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Parmenides. 2. ed. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1992 [1942/43]. (Gesamtausgabe, 54).
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Sein und Zeit. 19. ed. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 2006 [1927]. (Gesamtausgabe, 2).
HINRICHSEN, Bruno Lemos. Transcendência não transcendente: um problema heideggeriano. Curitiba: CRV, 2021.
HOLZHEY, Helmut; MUDROCH, Vilem. Historical dictionary of Kant and kantianism. Lanham: The Scarecrow Press, 2005.
KANT, Immanuel. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. In: KANT, Immanuel. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1974 [1788].
KANT, Immanuel. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1974 [1781/87]. 2v.
KANT, Immanuel. Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2001[1783].
LEISEGANG, Hans. Über die Behandlung des scholastischen Satzes: „Quodlibet ens est unum, verum, bonum seu perfectum“, und seine Bedeutung in Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Kant-Studien, Berlin, v. 20, n. 1-3, p. 403-421, nov. 2009.
OLIVEIRA, Manfredo Araújo. Lógica transcendental e lógica especulativa. In: OLIVEIRA, Manfredo Araújo. (Org.). Kant. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília, 1981.
WALSH, W. H. Kant and Metaphysics. Kant-Studien, Berlin, v. 67, n. 1-4, p. 372-384, set. 2009. Disponível em: <http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/kant.1976.67.issue-1-4/kant.1976.67.1-4.372/kant.1976.67.1-4.372.xml>. Acesso em: 22 set. 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Ágora Filosófica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
